Talk:Investigation of Apple's transfer pricing arrangements with Ireland

src: www.telegraph.co.uk

Hey Eoin, cheers for the feedback, I have made sure the history section is not just repeating what the 'Bosman Ruling' article has said. I have also added a quotas section to the 'Effects on Clubs' bit as you suggested. I will include a section on third-parties like agents as you suggested, however, I am still unsure about a section on Brexit as it is speculating what will happen rather than what has happened as a result of globalization. Finally, I will include a brief statement on how visa situations have improved since globalization, as you recommended. Howley.l (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eoin, just giving my peer review for your article. Great article, nice simple intro. Background is broken up nicely into two parts and isn't too long. The investigation is explained very well. Just a couple of minor recommendations. Found an issue or two with this sentence: "Even though the EUR13 billion windfall would benefit Irish finances ." The full stop is out of place, and I feel like the words should be a continuation of the sentence before rather than cut into its own short sentence. Also, the second image should probably have Noonan's name rather than just 'Minister for Finance.' The image also has a 'Read more' bit at the end of its caption which should probably be removed. Apart from these, a great article. Howley.l (talk) 03:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Liam, I appreciate the feedback. I have reviewed your changes and agree with each of them. The first sentence was a typo, have amended this. I agree with your note about adding in Michael Noonan's name to the picture also. I have added in his name. Thank you! -- Preceding unsigned comment added by Eoinm684 (talk o contribs) 20:45, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eoin,

I would like to leave you a peer review on your article. Overall I felt that this was a very balanced article in which you discussed how the Apple transfer pricing has affected Ireland while remaining neutral throughout. I also appreciated that you kept paragraphs balanced so not as to emphasize any aspect of the of the investigation or its findings. I would like to know if the $13 million dollars you mention in your lead paragraph is an exact figure or a rough figure.

Overall I really enjoyed this article. Gordon.re (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Rebecca,

I appreciate the feedback. Although not an exact figure, $13 is the figure currently touted by the European Commission. I have made a slight amendment to make this even more obvious. I'm glad you enjoyed the article.

Thank you, Eoin -- Preceding unsigned comment added by Eoinm684 (talk o contribs) 01:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Source of the article : Wikipedia